James Agalga, the Chairman of the Defence and Interior Committee of Parliament, has vehemently denied allegations that the committee received GH¢960,000 to facilitate the passage of the National Signals Bureau Act, 2020 (Act 1040).
“I categorically deny the spurious claims made by Adu Boahene through his lawyer,” a statement signed by Mr. Agalga, who also serves as the Member of Parliament for Builsa North, said.
“As the current chairman of the Defence and Interior Committee of Parliament, who also served as the Ranking Member of the same committee at the time Parliament considered and duly enacted the National Signals Bureau Act, 2020 (Act 1040), I find it appropriate to categorically deny the claims made by Adu Boahene through his lawyer,” he added.
Mr. Agalga clarified that the National Signals Bureau was established in 2020 following the passage of the National Signals Bureau Act, 2020 (Act 1040), towards the end of that year.
“At the time of the passage of Act 1040, Hon. Seth Acheampong, former MP for Mpraeso, was the chairman, while I served as the ranking member,” he explained.
Mr. Agalga continued by pointing out that the National Signals Bureau, the agency that Adu Boahene later headed as Director-General, did not exist before the passage of Act 1040, making it impossible for him to have facilitated the act by paying money to the Defence and Interior Committee.
“At the time of the passage of Act 1040, Adu Boahene was not yet involved with the National Signals Bureau,” Mr. Agalga emphasised. “In fact, I only met Adu Boahene in April or May 2021 when he appeared before our committee for the first time and was introduced to us by Albert Kan Dapaah, the then Minister of National Security, as the newly appointed Director-General of the National Signals Bureau—long after the passage of Act 1040.”
“It is not possible that Adu Boahene could have facilitated the passage of Act 1040 by paying monies to the Defence and Interior Committee, as he was not involved in the process,” Mr. Agalga added.
Mr. Agalga also explained that during the law’s passage, the committee had worked closely with the Minister for National Security, Albert Kan Dapaah, and the National Security Coordinator, Joshua Kyeremeh.
“The committee had no dealings with Adu Boahene at the time Parliament enacted Act 1040, and as such could not have received any money from him,” he stated.
Expressing his disappointment over the allegations, Mr. Agalga emphasised the importance of upholding the integrity of Parliament.
“It is crucial to note that throughout the period of the enactment of Act 1040, the committee worked exclusively with the Minister of National Security, Albert Kan Dapaah, who was the principal sponsor of the bill, and the late National Security Coordinator, Joshua Kyeremeh,” Mr. Agalga remarked. “Thus, the committee had no dealings with Adu Boahene at that time and could not have received money from him for any purpose.”